Bexley Council Hit With Requires Improvement CQC Rating London Borough 2026

Key Points

• The Care Quality Commission rated Bexley Council’s adult social care services as “requires improvement”.
• Inspectors evaluated the council against statutory duties in the Care Act 2014 covering disabled adults, older people, and unpaid carers.
• The inspection found 353 people waiting for overdue care reviews, a figure the council later reduced to 281.
• The watchdog assessed nine areas across four themes, scoring the council three (“good”) in four areas and two (“requires improvement”) in five.
• CQC inspectors noted good performance in reablement services, work with health and voluntary partners, and support for unpaid carers.
• The report detailed problems in safeguarding, governance, direct payments understanding, document accessibility, and safe care pathways.

Bexley (South London News) September 4, 2026 –London Borough of Bexley, Bexley Council, September 4, 2026 — Bexley Council has been officially rated as “requires improvement” by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) following a detailed statutory evaluation of its adult social care department. The regulatory judgment comes after inspectors uncovered significant backlogs in routine care reviews, leaving hundreds of vulnerable residents waiting for updated assessments of their support needs. The evaluation forms part of the regulatory body’s expanded statutory duties under Part 1 of the Care Act 2014, which requires the watchdog to assess how effectively local authorities fulfil their obligations to disabled adults, elderly residents, and unpaid carers.

Why Has Bexley Council Received a ‘Requires Improvement’ Assessment from the CQC?

As reported by Senior Reporter Poppy Huggett of This Is Local London and the News Shopper, the local authority achieved a mixed set of results across nine core performance metrics evaluated by inspectors. The CQC employs a four-point scoring framework, where a score of one denotes significant performance shortfalls, two represents areas requiring improvement, three indicates a good standard, and four reflects exceptional service delivery.

Bexley Council secured scores of three in four specific categories:

• Assessing people’s needs
• Supporting healthier lives
• Partnerships and communities
• Learning and innovation

However, the local authority received scores of two across five critical operational areas:

• Equity of experience
• Care provision and integration
• Safeguarding
• Governance
• Safe care pathways

As reported by Poppy Huggett of This Is Local London, Mary Cridge, Director of Adult Social Care at the CQC, stated that:

“During our assessment of the London Borough of Bexley, we found a mixed picture of people’s experience accessing adult social care. We found a local authority with several strengths to build on, alongside some areas where improvement is needed to ensure people consistently receive high-quality care and support.”

What Did the Inspection Reveal Regarding Resident Experiences and Local Services?

As reported by Poppy Huggett of This Is Local London, Mary Cridge of the CQC noted that frontline interactions were generally positive, stating:

“People told us they were generally treated with dignity and respect. People had been involved as they wished in decisions about their care and support needs at a pace which suited them. People were able to access the local authority’s care and support services in a range of ways, including online routes and self-assessment options. Staff described having strong support and training, with a clear focus on quality assessment and care planning.”

The published findings underscored strong performance within the council’s reablement pathways, which assist patients in rebuilding independent living skills after being discharged from hospital. Additionally, unpaid carers reported feeling valued, respected, and actively included in decision-making processes regarding their family members. Inspectors noted that care planning throughout the borough was person-centred and strengths-based, supported by regular staff supervision and reflective professional practice. The council was also commended for collaborating effectively with local NHS partners and voluntary organizations to provide home equipment and adaptations, allowing residents to live safely in their own homes.

Explore More Bexley News

Bexley Bin Collection Dates and Summer Schedule Revealed: Bexley 2026

Man Dies in Fatal Bexley Road House Fire: Erith 2026

What Severe Operational Shortfalls Were Highlighted by the Watchdog?

Despite these identified strengths, the inspection detailed serious inconsistencies in service delivery and administrative communication. A central issue highlighted by the regulator was the backlog of care reviews. At the time of the CQC assessment, 353 individuals were documented as having overdue adult social care reviews. Subsequent data provided by the council indicates that this backlog has since been reduced to 281 under an internal improvement plan.

Inspectors also discovered that several service users had never received physical copies of their care plans, leaving them uncertain about how the council intended to meet their specific needs. Overall resident satisfaction with local social care services remains beneath the national average, despite recent remedial efforts by local officials.

As reported by Poppy Huggett of This Is Local London, Mary Cridge of the CQC further stated:

“We also found that direct payments were not always well understood, with some people unaware of the support available and some staff lacking confidence in supporting people to access and manage them.”

Accessibility of information was flagged as another area of concern. The report cited the specific case of a resident with literacy difficulties who was not provided with assessment or review documents in an accessible format, nor given a verbal explanation they could understand. The local authority has since committed to upgrading its communication standards to prevent further occurrences.

Regarding administrative leadership, Mary Cridge of the CQC added:

“Leaders understood the areas that needed improvement and had already started work to address them, including reducing waiting times for reviews and improving accessibility.”

Background of Adult Social Care Assessments in the London Borough of Bexley

The regulation of adult social care in England underwent a significant structural shift under the Health and Care Act 2022, which granted the CQC new statutory powers to independently assess how local authorities meet their duties under Part 1 of the Care Act 2014. Previously, the CQC primarily inspected individual care homes, home care providers, and medical facilities, rather than evaluating the overarching administrative and commissioning performance of local councils.

In recent years, local councils across Greater London have faced compounding financial pressures alongside rising demand for complex social care, equipment adaptations, and mental health support. The statutory responsibilities under the Care Act 2014 demand that local authorities preserve a preventative framework, ensuring that care users and unpaid carers receive early interventions before reaching a point of acute crisis.

The London Borough of Bexley has previously been subject to regulatory oversight across multi-agency services. In May 2024, the Department for Education issued a formal Improvement Notice to Bexley Council following a joint inspection by Ofsted and the CQC into Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) provision. That notice required local leaders to urgently resolve gaps in joint commissioning, annual review backlogs, and service coordination across health, education, and social care. The recent CQC assessment of adult social care reflects the continued national rollout of local authority evaluations, designed to establish standardized baseline ratings across all 153 English top-tier councils.

Prediction: How This Development Will Affect Service Users, Carers, and Local Ratepayers

The “requires improvement” rating from the CQC will directly trigger operational adjustments across the London Borough of Bexley, affecting several key stakeholder groups:

• Adult Social Care Users: Residents relying on council-funded social care will likely experience accelerated review schedules as department managers attempt to clear the remaining 281 overdue care reviews. The implementation of accessible communication standards means individuals with learning difficulties, cognitive impairments, or literacy challenges should receive tailored documentation and clearer verbal explanations regarding their care provision. However, until governance and pathway integrations improve, some service users may still face transitional delays when moving between health settings and home care.
• Unpaid Carers and Direct Payment Recipients: Unpaid carers are likely to benefit from sustained support given their positive feedback during the inspection. However, individuals seeking direct payments—which allow service users to purchase their own care tailored to their preferences—can expect staff retraining initiatives. As council staff gain clearer guidance and confidence in managing direct payments, more families may gain financial autonomy over their care routines.
• Bexley Council and Local Ratepayers: To raise its performance scores from twos to threes across safeguarding, governance, and equity of experience, Bexley Council will need to allocate dedicated administrative resources toward oversight systems. Local taxpayers could see elected officials prioritize adult social care budgets in upcoming financial cycles to recruit additional review officers and clear operational bottlenecks. Failure to demonstrate progress in future CQC re-inspections could lead to increased regional oversight or formal regulatory escalation from health authorities.